![]() ![]() The problem involves clamping or lowering the footage superwhites after LUTs have been applied. The learning curve is not very steep from what I read, but I haven't started experimenting with it myself, so I can't say for sure. A number of Panasonic Lumix GH5 owners using Final Cut Pro X with LUT loading plug-ins have reported varying LUT interpretation results with 8-bit and 10-bit footage. Turns out the write speed would frequently drop below the required rate for 400Mbps. I used to be a Sandisk Extreme Pro SD Card fan, but like yourself I could never do more than 150Mbps. It's way more powerful and efficient since it uses the GPU instead of the CPU. I use two of these Sony cards with great results at C4K, 400Mb All-I 10-Bit 4-2-2 24fps with V-Log L. If you are willing to switch to a better software, and spend some money on an external GPU (since you have a Macbook), get DaVinci Resolve. Actually, the GH5, nice lens and computer (which is reasonably powerful) cost well under 3,000. SkierEvans wrote: A powerful enough computer for Resolve and a GH5 with lens etc must have cost you way over 5000. ![]() ALL-I records all the frames and the decoding is way easier on your computer. Re: Using Resolve with 4:2:2 10-bit GH5 files. LongGOP or IPB doesn't record all frames, it leaves the decoder (computer) to create the in between frames by using the captured ones. You will need faster and bigger SD cards, but you'll have a way smoother editing experience. But one big tip I can give is to use ALL-I compression instead of LongGOP. You could use FFmpeg to transcode the files into ProRes or DNxHD. Modern production pipelines often involve generating a wide mix of QuickTime, MXF, AVCHD, and HDV files. I was using Premiere CS6 and the MP4 files wouldn't even import (they appeared as audio files) after switching to CC 2018, I was able to import the files and edit them without issues. EditReady provides easy, powerful, and fast transcoding for video professionals. The first 1-2 seconds of each clip will retain the noise and completely distract the viewer with an ON/OFF hiss.to a point I'd rather leave the noise untouched in my videos.īut I digress.the files are also "big and complex". Adobe is a malevolent company that holds back on features to make you buy their other products or update your existing ones.just like Canon does xD Their noise reduction for example, on Premiere it's completely useless (You need Audition). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |